Education

The Rise of College Student Borrowing

by Rebecca Hinze-Pifer and Richard Fry, Pew Research Center
November 22, 2010

Overview

Undergraduate college student borrowing has risen dramatically in recent years. Graduates who received a bachelor’s degree in 2008 borrowed 50% more (in inflation-adjusted dollars) than their counterparts who graduated in 1996, while graduates who earned an associate’s degree or undergraduate certificate in 2008 borrowed more than twice what their counterparts in 1996 had borrowed, according to a new analysis of National Center for Education Statistics data by the Pew Research Center’s Social & Demographic Trends project.

Increased borrowing by college students has been driven by three trends:

More college students are borrowing. In 2008, 60% of all graduates had borrowed, compared with about half (52%) in 1996.

College students are borrowing more. Among 2008 graduates who borrowed, the average loan for bachelor’s degree recipients was more than $23,000, compared with slightly more than $17,000 in 1996. For associate’s degree and certificate recipients, the average loan increased to more than $12,600 from about $7,600 (all figures in 2008 dollars).

More college students are attending private for-profit schools, where levels and rates of borrowing are highest. Over the past decade, the private for-profit sector has expanded more rapidly than either the public or private not-for-profit sectors. In 2008, these institutions granted 18% of all undergraduate awards, up from 14% in 2003. Students who attend for-profit colleges are more likely than other students to borrow, and they typically borrow larger amounts.

Other key findings from the Pew Research Center analysis:

  • One-quarter (24%) of 2008 bachelor’s degree graduates at for-profit schools borrowed more than $40,000, compared with 5% of graduates at public institutions and 14% at not-for-profit schools.
  • Roughly one-in-four recipients of an associate’s degree or certificate borrowed more than $20,000 at both private for-profit and private not-for-profit schools, compared with 5% of graduates of public schools.
  • Graduates of private for-profit schools are demographically different from graduates in other sectors. Generally, private for-profit school graduates have lower incomes, and are older, more likely to be from minority groups, more likely to be female, more likely to be independent of their parents and more likely to have their own dependents.
  • Although private for-profit schools specialize in different fields of study than do public and private not-for-profit schools, the differences in borrowing patterns persist within fields of study. For almost every field of study at every level, students at private for-profit schools are more likely to borrow and tend to borrow larger amounts than students at public and private not-for-profit schools.

Read the full report at pewsocialtrends.org.

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by Editor - December 10, 2010 at 11:50 am

Categories: Changing Society, Education, Self-Improvement, Social Change, Society and Culture, Youth Issues   Tags: , , ,

Let’s Play A Game

Editor’s Note:  It may be enticing to click on the video screen first, but please browse at this first link first.

http://www.americasarmy.com/

Call of Duty, Black Ops Trailer – Product release date set as 11-9-10 -

YouTube Preview Image

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by Editor - September 8, 2010 at 10:50 am

Categories: Changing Society, Community, Education, Entertainment, Family, Media, Military, Social Change, Society and Culture, Technology, Youth Issues   Tags: , ,

Yesterday, it was the Counter Culture. Today… it’s
Tuesday, September 7, 2010

More Here @ 3 pm (PST)

Est. 1964 Re-Incarnated by Public Demand

This is the original, 60’s, counter culture, LA Free Press. Today’s Best Alternative View & Our Old Hippie Headlines, Too! A Head Trip for Smart Minds.

(This article refers directly to today’s issue of the Los Angeles Free Press. If you have not yet seen it, please, before reading further, click HERE.)

Yesterday, it was the Counter Culture. Today it’s…

…all about: How we’ve let the war in and, if we’ll ever, again, want to say “Nevermore”?

by Steven M. Finger

Not just commentary, today, but also a secret that the literati have long hidden from us… surely, its revelation will be met with protest.  Already, I see it is time for me to move from here… but by nightfall I will publish that, as well.

As promised, our revelation…

Little known, and held closely as a secret, Edgar Allan Poe, favored peace to such an extent that he covertly supported the anti-war movement with hidden messages throughout his work, much as did Michelangelo.  Further, and very much the darker secret, again like the great Italian Renaissance painter, sculptor, architect, and engineer that few know as a poet, many of his thoughts related directly to the old testament and other Hebrew texts, such as the Kabala.

(Michelangelo’s use of Judaic texts, their ancient Hebrew language, along with kabalistic principles is well documented by various books and authors, among them is the The Sistine Secrets: Michelangelo’s Forbidden Messages in the Heart of the Vatican (HarperOne), co-authored by Rabbi Benjamin Blech, assistant professor of Talmud at Yeshiva University and Roy Doliner, a Vatican docent.

The book purports, for instance, that the paintings covering the Sistine Chapel, the largest fresco painting on earth in the holiest of Christianity’s chapels, not only does not contain a single Christian image but, rather, the faces of Old Testament heroes and heroines; the forbidden Tree of Knowledge is not an apple tree, but a fig tree, as written in the Talmud; the altar where Mary was supposed to appear, has the Jewish prophet Jonah, whose hands and legs form two Hebrew letters – an embedded messages of brotherhood, a direct challenge to the repressive Roman Catholic Church of the time.  His messages were for peace and brotherhood.)

Leonardo da Vinci, is also well-known for his use of misdirection.  His paintings often lead an observer in one direction, though the realization of a hidden meaning can suddenly transform the picture into a message of, often forbidden, knowledge.

As with Poe, a detailed examination of his works reveals the magnitude of his genius.  (Astonishing, there is a great deal of complexity hidden behind what appears to be so simple a poetic rhyme that one can almost carry it themselves as if it were only a tune!)

For these reasons, much of Mr. Poe’s work has been mis-interpreted, and thoughts closer to the truth have been discouraged.  For instance, in the case The Raven, it was initially said that it was written without allegory (a representation conveying meaning other than the literal). Of course, that was preposterous; most readers easily recognizing the Raven from other texts as a ‘devil’s bird’.  But the repeated opposition kept many from making the transition to the next level, as had Poe.  And that was even though seventh stanza (a significant number in the Old Testament) clearly says the Raven carried himself as ‘a lord’.

The further development of the metaphor, through the allegorical device, transforms this Raven which spoke only one word – Nevermore – into a Lord of War who, actually, spoke volumes.

And never, out loud, is the translation of the three significant and most repeated words  – in all their singular and compounded uses – mentioned.  Here, is that key that, when placed correctly into the poem, converts it into a stark, anti-war message.

The secret conversions: The word ‘Never’ must be understood as ‘always’, ‘more’ as ‘war’ and, finally, the ‘name’ of what is persistently perceived as a true woman (Lenore) is, instead, the sadly lost concept of ‘end of war’.

As his craft would demand, these words perfectly maintain the rhyme and meter.  And that is true in both the most overt sense – the second line (each stanza having six) and the last line, as well as the intricate ‘internal’ rhyming that as been explored in many critical works.

Finally, we note, that in a last testament to the choice of peace over war, Mr. Poe made sure that the poem extended to exactly 18  stanzas – the numerical connotation in Hebrew ‘for life’.

We have now provided – in the posting that immediately follows this one – the entire text of the poem so that you may print it and apply the conversions. Our thought being that narrator’s anguish would be a cool juxtaposition of those slick commercials which, instead, encourage war.  (Let us know here!!)


Here are the keywords to our thinking today: Family, Community, Public Service, Military Service, U.S. Navy, U.S. Army, U.S. Marine Corp, U.S. Air Force,  Changing Society, Self-Improvement, Social Change, Society & Culture

Here are links to today’s items:

[1] Why Your Kid is Going to Join the U.S. Air Force

[2] Why Your Kid is Going to Join the U.S. Navy

[3] Why Your Kid is Going to Join the U.S. Army

[4] Why Your Kid is Going to Join The U.S. Marine Corp

[5] War or “Nevermore”?

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by Editor - September 7, 2010 at 10:00 am

Categories: Changing Society, Community, Education, Family, Government & Politics, Military, Self-Improvement, Social Change, Society and Culture, Youth Issues   Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Patriot Act Stands Over Students

Following is a statement by young people associated with the American Civil Liberties Union of how the Patriot Act and other Post-911 government policies have adversely affected students.

Under the USA PATRIOT Act and Other Post-911 Policies the Government Can Now:
1. Label Students “Terrorists” if We Belong to a Student Activist Group
The USA PATRIOT Act broadly expands the official definition of terrorism, so that student groups that engage in certain types of civil disobedience could very well find themselves labeled as terrorists
(Sections 411, 802). The Sheriff of Hennepin county, Minnesota declared that the student groups “Anti-Racist Action”, “Students Against War”, and “Arise!” were potential terrorist threats.
.
2. Seize Our Student Records
The USA PATRIOT Act gives law enforcement access to student educational records without probable cause of crime. (507) The Government refuses to disclose how many times it has done this.
3. Collect information about what books we take out of our school library, what we study, and what we purchase from our school bookstore.
The USA PATRIOT Act gives law enforcement broad access to any types of records – sales, library, financial, medical, etc. – without probable cause of a crime. It also prohibits the holders of this information, like University librarians, from disclosing that they have produced such records, under the
threat of jail time (Section 215, 505). A University of Illinois survey of U.S. public libraries found that at least 545 libraries had been asked for records by law enforcement in the year after September 11, 2001.
.
4. Search Our College Dorm Rooms, Apartments or Homes and Not Even Tell Us.
The USA PATRIOT Act allows the law enforcement to conduct secret “sneak and peek” searches of a dorm, apartment or home. Investigators can enter a place of residence, take pictures and seize items without informing the occupant that a warrant was issued for an indefinite period of time. (Section 213)
The government refuses to disclose how many times it has used this power.
.
5. Monitor Student E-mail and Internet Activity
The USA PATRIOT Act permits the government to monitor Internet traffic and e-mail communications on any Internet service provider without probable cause of crime by obtaining detailed “routing” information like a web address. While this provision is supposedly aimed at lawbreakers, it sweeps broadly because e-mails and Internet traffic information of innocent students cannot be separated from the activity of targeted individuals (Section 216). The government refuses to disclose how many times it has
used this power.
.
6. Spy on Student Political Meetings or Religious Ceremonies
The USA PATRIOT Act permits a vast array of information gathering on student political meetings and religious ceremonies to be collected—often by campus cops on behalf of the FBI—and shared with the CIA (and other non-law enforcement officials) without proper judicial oversight or other safeguards. This law effectively puts the CIA back in the business of spying on students, including US citizens (Sections 203 and 901).
.
Please go to http://www.aclu.org/ for more information on civil liberties that the ACLU has a hand in protecting.

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by Editor - September 1, 2010 at 10:10 am

Categories: Changing Society, Civil Rights, Community, Education, Government & Politics, Social Change, Society and Culture, Youth Issues   Tags: , , , , , , ,

Librarians Push Against Patriot Act

By Lauren Barack — School Library Journal, 11/30/2009

When it comes to the Patriot Act, there’s little dissension among librarians.

As of late November, 32 state chapters of the American Library Association (ALA) passed resolutions that call for Congress to allow section 215 of the law to sunset, instead of Capitol Hill reauthorizing it before December 31, 2009.

ALA’s Lynne Bradley, director of the American Library Association’s Office of Government Relations.

Section 215 allows the federal government to demand tangible records from any business, organization, entity, person—and even the public library—and then places a gag order on them about speaking of the demand. Many believe this act violates the right to privacy, broadly alluded to in our nation’s Bill of Rights.

“It’s often called the library provision because the ALA made such a stink about this when no one else would,” says Lynne Bradley, director of the American Library Association’s Office of Government Relations in Washington, DC.

ALA passed the first resolution against the section at its national meeting in July. Vermont followed as the first state chapter in September, tweaking its resolution to include opposition to Section 505, which allows the FBI to use National Security Letters to demand similar information within a gag order as well.

Michigan, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, and Kentucky are the latest four states to pass resolutions, too, and ALA heads expect all 50 state chapters to pass similar acts before the end of the year.

While no one is allowed to speak about whether they’ve been served with a Section 215 order, Bradley says a handful of libraries have received them, and a few have even challenged them in court.

“But before the challenges were heard, the FBI withdrew the orders before the information was made public,” she says.

As to whether Congress will be swayed by the library resolutions, Bradley appears unmoved. She notes that the White House appears supportive of the Department of Justice recommendations, which would prefer to have all sections re-ratified.

Besides Section 215, these include Section 206, which deals with roving wire taps, and Section 6001 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 called “Lone Wolf,” which isn’t part of the Patriot Act, but lets intelligence groups investigate single suspects—which many groups fear could be used against protesters.

“I’m normally a betting woman, but I’m not betting on this one,” says Bradley. “We are very disappointed that the White House appears to be have accepted the recommendations of the Department of Justice to move forward with very little changes. And that’s more than a disappointment.”

This article originally appeared in SLJ’s Extra Helping “https://www.schoollibraryjournal.com/subscribe.asp?screen=pi8″

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by Editor - at 10:02 am

Categories: Changing Society, Civil Rights, Education, Government & Politics, Social Change, Society and Culture   Tags: , , , , , ,

Students Are Voting Again to Build a Movement

Lindsay McCluskey

President, United States Student Association

August 30, 2010

Students are voting again in 2010 because we’re building a movement. This movement did not begin with the 2008 vote campaign and it certainly did not end with the election of Barack Obama. It is a movement to make education a right and has been a driving force behind social progress for decades. We are fortunate enough to be organizing in a time of great opportunity and have capitalized on the leadership of President Obama and members of Congress. The passage of student financial aid reform, the biggest investment in higher education since the GI bill, is a testament to this. However, we are simply passing through one era of this movement and have a responsibility as organizers to build upon past victories. We are voting again, not just to elect members of Congress who will champion higher education causes, but also to construct a more perfect framework of student activism that will lead to students winning on issues directly affecting young people.

This is no lofty goal born of soaring but empty rhetoric. The 2010 election provides us with a strategic moment to make vast strides in the student movement. A strong foundation of grassroots organizing was laid during the 2008 election which was then utilized to mobilize young people around student aid reform, protesting budget cuts and tuition hikes, and making huge advancements for the Development, Relief and Education, for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act. These efforts amplified the student voice worldwide and won some key victories in college affordability. The momentum from those campaigns must now be carried forward to the 2010 election so that additional victories will be won in 112th Congress.

We are continuing our vote work for the new batch of young voters as well. There are around 9.5 million eligible voters today who were too young to vote in 2008 and during such a tight election, each new voter can make a huge difference. Additionally, it is well known that those who vote early continue to be civically engaged throughout their lives. So by engaging, educating, registering, and turning these new students out to vote, we are helping to cultivate a new generation of organizers.

We are organizing to vote again because when we don’t, candidates simply ignore young people. The 2009 New Jersey and Virginia gubernatorial elections clearly showed that candidates don’t address youth issues if they are not forced to. There are too many important issues facing students both immediately and in the long-term health of the country’s education system to allow candidates to ignore us. Two-thirds of students are forced to take out loans to pay for college, driving the average borrower nearly $25,000 into debt. That is on top of youth, especially youth of color, suffering from an unemployment rate much higher than the national average. Undocumented students are still being denied their right to a higher education because partisan bickering. More than 30 states cut higher education budgets last year and 30 will do it again this year. These are issues we have to force candidates to address if we want to change them.

We are in the midst of a student movement to make education a right, and we are voting and organizing in 2010 to ensure that the pathway before us continues to lead us towards that ultimate vision.

Cross posted on Vote Again 2010

Follow Lindsay McCluskey on Twitter: www.twitter.com/USStudents

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by Editor - August 30, 2010 at 11:15 am

Categories: Changing Society, Community, Education, Government & Politics, Social Change, Society and Culture   Tags: , , , , ,

Next Page »