Narcotics Agents Listed
In the 60’s, it was a fairly common practice… operating with authorization but without revelation, Narcotics Agents (Narks) were one moment having a friendly conversation and, in the next, slapping on the cuffs. We (the LA Free Press) took issue with that; there was to be no ’secret’ police force in America.
LA Free Press, 1964 Narcotics Agents Listed
PLEASE READ the FIRST TWO paragraphs of the above. Ardently, we STILL believe this: Communication leads to understanding, understanding leads not only to peaceful co-existence, but is the most productive path to a society that respects and serves the needs of all of its members to its own greatest good.
Now, please, go to our Facebook Page to discuss this further.
Categories: Changing Society, Civil Rights, Community, Law Enforcement, Liberal Politics, Media, Social Change, Society and Culture Tags: C, LA Free Press Archives, Narcotics Agents Listed
Categories: Changing Society, Community, Law Enforcement, Social Change, Society and Culture Tags: Los Angeles Free Press, Los Angeles Free Press Archives
Congress Should Re-Examine The Patriot Act: A Statement By The ACLU
The following statement was issued by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) to update its opposition to the Patriot Act.
The ACLU is urging Congress to use 2010 to examine all of our surveillance laws, (including the Patriot Act that was made law after the destruction of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001) and amend those that have been found unconstitutional or have been abused to collect information on innocent people, including last year’s changes to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and the Attorney General Guidelines (AGGs).
On February 25, 2010, Congress passed a one-year extension of three expiring Patriot Act provisions without making much-needed changes to the overly broad surveillance bill. In late 2009, to avoid expiration on December 31, Congress briefly extended the provisions. Despite bills pending in both the House and the Senate to amend the three expiring provisions and other sections of the Patriot Act, Congress decided instead to move ahead with a straightforward re-authorization.
Despite the many amendments to these laws since 9/11, Congress and the public have yet to receive real information about how these powerful tools are being used to collect information on Americans and how that information is being used. All of these laws work together to create a surveillance superstructure – and Congress must understand how it really works to create meaningful protections for civil liberties.
The ACLU’s recent report, Reclaiming Patriotism, provides more information on parts of the Patriot Act that need to be amended.
- National Security Letters (NSLs). The FBI uses NSLs to compel internet service providers, libraries, banks, and credit reporting companies to turn over sensitive information about their customers and patrons. Using this data, the government can compile vast dossiers about innocent people. Government reports, as recent as February of 2010, confirm that upwards of 50,000 of these secret record demands go out each year. In response to an ACLU lawsuit (Doe v. Holder), the Second Circuit Court of Appeal struck down as unconstitutional the part of the NSL law that gives the FBI the power to prohibit NSL recipients from telling anyone that the government has secretly requested customer Internet records.
- Material Support Statute. This provision criminalizes providing “material support” to terrorists, defined as providing any tangible or intangible good, service or advice to a terrorist or designated group. As amended by the Patriot Act and other laws since September 11, this section criminalizes a wide array of activities, regardless of whether they actually or intentionally further terrorist goals or organizations. Federal courts have struck portions of the statute as unconstitutional and a number of cases have been dismissed or ended in mistrial.
- FISA Amendments Act of 2008. This past summer, Congress passed a law to permit the government to conduct warrantless and suspicion-less dragnet collection of U.S. residents’ international telephone calls and e-mails. This too must be amended to provide meaningful privacy protections and judicial oversight of the government’s intrusive surveillance power.
For more information, go here: http://www.reformthepatriotact.org/
Categories: Changing Society, Civil Rights, Community, Government & Politics, Law Enforcement, Social Change, Society and Culture Tags: ACLU, Art Kunkin, FISA Amendments Act of 2008, National Security Letters, NSLs, Patriot Act
Yesterday, it was the Counter Culture. Today… it’s
Thursday, September 2, 2010
More Here @ 3 pm (PST)
(This article refers directly to today’s issue of the Los Angeles Free Press. If you have not yet seen it, please, before reading further, click HERE.)
Yesterday, it was the Counter Culture. Today it’s…
all about who’s looking into our life and why, and how we, individually and collectively, have come to say no way, no more.
by Steven M. Finger
Private companies all have reasons for meddling into your life… money motivated, for sure. After all, they are in business. Any opportunity for them to find out personal information so that they can make a dollar… I think we can all understand that.
But the Patriot Act is something altogether. Is it protecting our liberties, or chipping away at our civil rights, keeping us safe from terrorists or putting us under the same rule that seek to institute?
Today, I’m most sure that I do not want all factions of society to go unwatched, too many people who believe anti-social actions have value and the fact that one crazy can do much more harm than ever before. But, still, and it is a difficult balance to strike, freedom with social order thru self-governance is the premise on which this country founded. And the one that we’ve adopted and regularly pledge to continue.
And so, its intrusion rankles our majority, even if we do wish that every corner can be looked into to find the bad guys; the downside, the good that it keeps from blossoming, the opportunity it stifles for self vigilance is not worth the maintenance of that Act.
And our acceptance – tolerance – of its being is what leads to our consideration and submission to other things which would normally be dismissed out of hand. A National ID Card? At one time, even the mention of it, with or without the fresh thought of what had happened in other countries would have been enough to scuttle the idea.
If it’s not clear how far we’ve moved from that line, see the Los Angeles Free Press Archive Piece for today. Did we actually think, back then, that the money-motivated merchants would do more than look over our shoulder for any other reason than to sell us stuff? And were we so wrong to wonder?
Hold the line, before it is so faint that it will be hard to grasp.
Here are the keywords to our thinking today: Credit Cards, LA Free Press, Los Angeles Free Press Archives, Privacy Issues, ACLU, Art Kunkin, Cato, Janet Napolitano, National ID, PASS ID, REAL ID ACT, FISA Amendments Act of 2008, National Security Letters, NSLs, Patriot Act, Political Humor, Big Brother, Surveillance Society, Changing Society, Self-Improvement, Social Change, Society & Culture
Here are links to today’s items:
[1] Patriot Act: to Peel or Re-Peel?
[2] Congress Should Re-Examine The Patriot Act: A Statement By The ACLU
[4] Credit Cards Threaten Privacy! (Says 1969 LAFree Press Article)
Categories: Changing Society, Civil Rights, Community, Government & Politics, Law Enforcement, Political Humor, Social Change, Society and Culture Tags: ACLU, Art Kunkin, Arthur Kunkin, Big Brother, Cato, Changing Society, Credit Cards, FISA Amendments Act of 2008, Janet Napolitano, Khalil Bendib, L.A. Free Press, LA Free Press, Los Angeles Free Press, Los Angeles Free Press Archives, National ID, National Security Letters, NSLs, PASS ID, Patriot Act, personal privacy, political humor, privacy, Privacy Issues, REAL ID (Identification) ACT, REAL Identification ACT, Section 203, Section 215, Section 901, Self-Improvement, Social Change, Society & Culture, Steven M. Finger, Student Activist Groups, Students, Surveillance Society, terrorists
European police to spy on Britons: Now ministers hand over Big Brother powers to foreign officers
By James Slack
26th July 2010
New powers: Police officers from European countries could soon be able to spy on and arrest Britons in the UK
Ministers are ready to hand sweeping Big Brother powers to EU states so they can spy on British citizens.
Foreign police will be able to travel to the UK and take part in the arrest of Britons.
They will be able to place them under surveillance, bug telephone conversations, monitor bank accounts and demand fingerprints, DNA or blood samples.
Anyone who refuses to comply with a formal request for co-operation by a foreign-based force is likely to be arrested by UK officers.
The move will spark a damaging row with backbench Tory MPs opposed to giving such draconian powers to Brussels.
The Tories were opposed to the directive in opposition, saying it showed a ‘relish for surveillance and disdain for civil liberties’.
But ministers have made a dramatic U-turn since joining the pro-EU Lib Dems in government, and the wide-ranging powers are due to be approved later this week.
According to the campaign group Fair Trials International, under the new rules it would be possible, for example, for Spanish police investigating a murder in a nightclub to demand the ID of every British citizen who flew to the country in the month the offence took place.
They could also force the UK to search its DNA database – which contains nearly one million innocent people – and send samples belonging to anybody who was in Spain at the time.
This could leave an entirely innocent person facing an agonising battle to establish his or her innocence.
Tory MP Dominic Raab, who has campaigned against the power grab, said: ‘This sweeping directive would put serious operational strains on hard-pressed UK police forces.
‘There are scant safeguards to protect the personal information of law-abiding British citizens. These serious issues should be properly debated in Parliament before the UK decides to opt in.’
Read more at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1297621/Ministers-hand-Big-Brother-powers-EU-police.html#ixzz0yIqbIu7X
Categories: Changing Society, Civil Rights, Government & Politics, Law Enforcement, Social Change, Society and Culture, World Politics Tags: Big Brother in Britain, Fair Trials International, James Slack, Surveillance Society
Encrypt Your Phone Conversations! Make Them Secure From Big Brother!
http://zfoneproject.com/ This is the url where you can obtain information and a free download of Phil Zimmerman’s new program, zphone, allowing anyone to have phone conversations that can not be overheard by hackers, criminal or political.
Phil Zimmerman is the developer of the program Pretty Good Privacy. PGP is widely used on the internet by companies and individuals to maintain privacy. Big Brother does not like this program because PGP can prevent the government from viewing exchanges between individuals on the internet i.e. internet-tapping. As a result, Zimmerman has a long history of involvement in litigation with the government over legislation and rules preventing the export of PGP to other countries. The L.A. Free Press will provide you with more information about zphone as this story develops.










